|
Get recognized as a thought leader (select a link below):
Suggest a topic
Speak at an event
Sponsor an event
|
 |
KSR Teleconference
Home

|
Clarifying KSR & Impact on Patent Law LIVE
Teleconference
|
|
Summary
The recent Supreme Court Ruling
KSR v Teleflex which
dismissed "obvious" or rigid
interpretation in favor of "flexible"
may perhaps usher one of the
most significant with the eighth
changes in Patent law in decades. How will KSR affect your
ability to protect your companies' intellectual property?
The Knowledge Congress has assembled panel of distinguished
experts to help make these policies clear to the organizations
most impacted. The panel will present their findings in a
livetwo-hour teleconference scheduled for November.
Topics Covered (Partial List):
- Presumption of validity and the clear and
convincing standard for proving obviousness;
· Litigation strategy, including:
§ Prior art fact discovery;
§ Expert reports/opinions;
§ Motions for summary judgment;
§ Breadth of admissible prior art;
§ Trial presentation;
· Pending
litigation considerations;
· Appeals;
and
· The Patent
and Trademark Office, including:
§ The PTO’s memo regarding its application of KSR;
§ Pending applications; and
§ Reexaminations
Teleconference Date & Time
Tuesday, November 20th, 2007
1:00 pm to 3:00 pm (EST)

Registration Code: WEB or call
646.202.9344
Sponsor this event
Speak at this event
|
Speaker
Firms & Organizations:
|
|
United States Patent and
Trademark Office
(USPTO)
John J. Love
Deputy Commissioner for
Patent Examination Policy
United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO)
|
|

Jeff G. Randall
Partner / Head of Patent Litigation
Skadden’s Palo Alto & Washington, D.C.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP
|
|

Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Partner, Lead Counsel
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer Feld LLP
|
 |
Kenneth Bass III
Of Counsel
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
 |
Thomas L. Colson
President & CEO
IP.com |
|
Event Sponsor: |
|

Event Speaker: John Dragseth, Principal
Fish & Richardson P.C.
is an international law firm with
more than 425 lawyers in 11
offices throughout the United
States as well as in Munich,
Germany. The firm is one of the
largest in the United States
practicing intellectual property,
litigation, and corporate law and
offers global services that
include worldwide IP strategy and
representation in multi-
national litigation. Founded in
1878, the firm represented
Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham
Bell, and the Wright
Brothers. For more than 125 years
we have served great
innovators, helping to protect
countless ideas, nurture
discoveries, and bring new
concepts to market. The firm
prosecuted and litigated many of
the fundamental patents of
an industrialized America, serving
corporations creating the
cutting-edge technologies of the
day: the telephone, the air-
brake, the steam turbine, the
automobile, and the radio.
Frederick Fish, the firm's
founder, was for many years the
acknowledged leader of the patent
bar of the entire country
at a time when patents were more
important than they had
ever been. Today, the firm
continues to represent great
innovators working in cutting-edge
technologies. In fact, Fish
represents 11 of the top 25
World's Most Innovative
Companies, as identified in a
Spring 2007 Business Week
survey. |
|
Who Should Attend?
|
|
In-house Counsel, IP Attorneys &
Consultants, Corporate Senior
Management.
|
|
|
Why Attend?
|
|
This is a must attend event for
anyone interested in understanding understanding the impact of
the KSR
ruling to companies.
o
New guidance explained by the most qualified key
leaders & experts.
o
Hear directly from key regulators & thought
leaders.
o
Interact directly with panel during Q&A
|
|
|
|
Faculty
Bios (Please Check Back for Updates)
|
United States Patent and
Trademark Office
(USPTO)

John J. Love
Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy
United States Patent and
Trademark Office
(USPTO)
|
Bio:
John J. Love was named Deputy Commissioner
for Patent Examination Policy for the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) in January 2007. He is responsible for
changes in patent practice, rules of practice and procedures,
examining priorities, and classification of technological arts.
He leads the operations of the Patent Legal Administration,
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Legal Administration, and the
Office of Petitions.
Previously, Mr. Love worked on establishing patent examination
policy for business methods and computer-related inventions. He
has given numerous presentations on this topic at national and
international meetings.
Mr. Love joined the USPTO in 1969. After achieving primary
examiner status in 1975, he was selected as a Supervisory Patent
Examiner in 1978. He was appointed to the Senior Executive
Service in 1988 as Director for Group 330, which included
medical treatment and diagnostics subject matter patent
applications. He joined Technology Center 2700 in 2000 to manage
patent application examination in the growing area of business
methods.
Mr. Love was a participant in the 1984-85 Department of Commerce
Science and Technology Fellowship Program, during which he was
detailed to the International Trade Administration. He has
served as chairman of the Supervisory Patent Examiners and
Classifiers Organization (SPECO), and he is a member of Pi Tau
Sigma, the honorary mechanical engineering fraternity.
Mr. Love received his undergraduate degree in mechanical
engineering from the University of Detroit. He earned a juris
doctor degree from Georgetown University, and is a member of the
Virginia State Bar.
|
|


Jeff G. Randall
Partner / Head of
Patent Litigation
Skadden’s Palo Alto &
Washington, D.C.
Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP
|
Bio:
Recent representative matters and
recognition include:
Joined the appellate team for his client, Genentech, in
obtaining review by the California Supreme Court of a $500
million jury verdict for breach of a patent license agreement;
Represented Applied Materials before the California Court of
Appeal in a case involving indemnification for method patent
claims;
Won an appeal for Intel before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit regarding declaratory judgment jurisdiction in
patent cases;
Won a jury trial in Delaware for McKesson Corporation on a
patent covering medical computer systems; and
Won a landmark case for eBay before the U.S. Supreme Court,
establishing that injunctions should not be presumed in patent
cases (recognized in 2007 by Managing Intellectual Property as
“Case of the Year,” for taking patent trolls head on;
establishing it as “as one of the most important U.S. patent
cases in many years”).
In January of this year, The American Lawyer named Mr. Randall
to its list of “Fabulous 50” Rising Stars in Litigation,
recognizing 50 lawyers who have made their mark in and out of
the courtroom and who “will set the pace for the conflict ridden
future.” Mr. Randall was also recently named one of
“California’s Top 30 IP Attorneys” by the Daily Journal and was
listed in its “Rainmakers” supplement in 2005 and 2006. In
addition, he was selected for inclusion in Chambers USA:
America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2007.
|
|


Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Partner, Lead Counsel
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer Feld LLP
|
Bio:
SAs lead counsel,
Jeffrey K. Sherwood has tried many matters for the firm's
clients.
For the past several years, Mr. Sherwood’s practice has
concentrated on patent infringement and intellectual property
litigation. His cases have encompassed many diverse areas of
engineering, science and technology, including semiconductor
products, telecommunications, satellite technology, nuclear
power technology, pharmaceutical and chemical products, Internet
technologies and many other areas. Mr. Sherwood has successfully
handled several Markman hearings and technology tutorials,
presenting complex technical and legal concepts in clear,
understandable terms.
Over the course of Mr. Sherwood’s career, he has served as trial
counsel defending many other science, engineering and medical
cases involving trade secrets, domain name disputes, products
liability and other tort claims, employment contract claims, and
insurance coverage claims. He served as one of the principal
architects of a consensus monograph by scientists from around
the world on the benefits and risks of a major cancer drug. Mr.
Sherwood also has handled several appeals, including a case
before the District of Columbia Court of Appeals that
established that market share liability is not a viable theory
of recovery in the District of Columbia. He also has
participated in a variety of alternative dispute proceedings,
including mediation, arbitration and a summary jury trial.
Mr. Sherwood received his A.B. from Colby College in 1975 and
his J.D. from Stanford Law School in 1979. He is a member of the
of Virginia, District of Columbia and Texas Bars.
|
|


John Dragseth
Principal
Fish & Richardson P.C.
|
Bio:
John Dragseth is a
principal of Fish & Richardson P.C. His practice emphasizes
complex analytical and writing work in patent law—including
federal appeals, patent prosecution, pre-suit and due diligence
investigations, and patent opinions. He writes and lectures
frequently on a variety of patent law topics.
Mr. Dragseth has
led the briefing on more than 30 appeals to the U.S. Supreme
Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
where he was previously a law clerk to the Honorable Raymond C.
Clevenger III. He has extensive experience in taking over cases
on appeal and framing them for the Federal Circuit, while
working closely with trial counsel. As part of his appellate
practice, he frequently consults with trial teams to ensure that
they are properly preparing their cases for the best result on
appeal.
Mr. Dragseth
focuses on technologies in the fields of medical devices,
software, electronics, and business methods. He grew up on a
small grain and sugar beet farm and was a law clerk at Honeywell
Inc. (1994-1995), and a consulting project engineer in the
medical group at Ellerbe Becket, Inc. (1991-1993).
He earned a B.S.
degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of
Minnesota, and a J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law
School.
|
|


Kenneth Bass III
Of Counsel
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
|
Bio:
Mr. Bass began his
legal career clerking for Justice Hugo Black of the Supreme
Court. In the past 35 years, he has briefed and argued cases in
federal and state courts across the country. Mr. Bass was
co-counsel for Teleflex in KSR v. Teleflex, the most significant
Supreme Court decision in patent law in the past 40 years. He
was one of the authors of the petitioner's brief in Wal-Mart v.
Samara, where the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Second
Circuit and established a significant principle for trade dress
protection. He was a principal author of AWH's brief in Phillips
v. AWH that involves reconsideration of all of the significant
principles of patent claim construction.
Mr. Bass is a Past President of the prestigious American Academy
of Appellate Lawyers and a founding Master of the Edward Coke
Inn of Appellate Practice.
A sought-after legal commentator, Mr. Bass is comfortable in all
facets of the media and has recently been a guest on MSNBC's
Hardball with Chris Matthews.
Mr. Bass has particular technical experience in electronics and
computer programming.
Juris Doctor, Yale University, cum laude, • A.B., Chemistry,
Duke University, summa cum laude
|
|


Thomas L. Colson
President & CEO
IP.com
|
Bio:
Thomas J. Colson
is a registered patent attorney with deep experience in both
prosecution and litigation. Unlike most other attorneys
throughout the world though, Mr. Colson has years of hands-on
experience in business. Since the legal function exists solely
to support the business goals of clients, such business
experience is of critical importance. And, since intellectual
property has become the business weapon of choice, such
combination experience is fast becoming a requirement for all
visionary companies. Simply put, without an intimate
appreciation of the business challenges and goals of clients, an
attorney cannot adequately support its clients’ needs within the
realities of global competition.
Throughout his career, Mr. Colson has succeeded in business
roles from Sales & Marketing, to Operational Management, to
President. As the president of a Manning & Napier company, he
assisted clients in creating and implementing robust
intellectual property strategies to support business goals such
as building market entry barriers, enhancing product/service
margins, creating distribution networks, leveraging partner
relationships, increasing corporate valuations, and generating
low cost licensing revenue.
To assist clients in implementing such business driven
intellectual property strategies, Mr. Colson has created client
specific processes (using industry best practices and tools) for
invention creation, invention and information capture, and
intellectual property exploitation.
And, as much as deep business experience enables a patent
attorney to fully appreciate the needs of a business client, to
fully appreciate the needs of an inventor, a patent attorney
must himself be an inventor. Mr. Colson is an inventor. He has
invented software and business methods associated with the
efficient analysis and management of intellectual property. He
is currently the named inventor in eight United States patent
applications.
Through his work with customers across the United States, Mr.
Colson has become a recognized expert in the creation and
implementation of intellectual property strategies. He has been
a primary speaker at events sponsored by the American
Intellectual Property Lawyers Association, ARMA, American Bar
Association, Licensing Executive Society, Corporate Intellectual
Property Institute, SIPO (Chinese Patent Office), Intellectual
Property Society of San Jose, North Carolina Bar Association,
LinuxWorld, American Chemical Engineers Association, Association
of Food Scientists, Database 2002 of Tokyo, Upstate Alliance For
Innovation, Women in Computers, Marcus Evans, and others.
Moreover, Mr. Colson’s opinions on intellectual property issues
have been solicited by members of the United States Congress,
and he has been quoted in articles appearing in the New York
Times, London Financial Times, California Lawyer, many other
magazines and journals, and a book entitled, “Edison in the
Boardroom.” As well, Mr. Colson has written many articles
related to intellectual property that have been published in
journals and magazines such as Directors & Boards, Patent World,
Ivy Business Journal, Chemical Innovation, CIO, BioTech,
IndustryWeek, IAM Magazine, Patent Strategy & Management,
Successful Meetings, Machine Design, Law.com, MIP, and Future
and the Inventor.
|
|
About The Knowledge Congress: |
|
The Knowledge Congress
is an organization that produces live teleconferences which
examine regulatory changes and their impacts across a variety of
industries. “We bring together the world's leading authorities
and industry participants through informative two-hour
teleconferences to study the impact of changing regulations.”
If you would like
to be informed of other
upcoming events,
please click
here.
|
|
Any Questions?
General
Inquiries:
info@knowledgecongress.org
Registration
Questions:
register@knowledgecongress.org
|
|
|
|