Tell a Friend


Trademark Litigation: A 2013 Update
   LIVE Webcast  


Event Details:                                                                                                                                                          

Trademark law has continued to become ever more complex. To add to the challenge, courts regularly revise trademark law affecting trademark holders along with the manner by which the law will be applied. Similarly, trademark related litigation is also on the rise. It is therefore essential for in-house counsel and attorneys responsible for trademark protection to be aware of the developments.

In this two-hour LIVE webcast, our panel of thought leaders will discuss key issues regarding trademark litigation. Speakers will cite and examine cases, provide valuable insights on trademark law updates and will offer tools and best practices to help you manage and protect your IP assets. A LIVE Q&A session is also included in this event.

Course Level: Intermediate
Prerequisite: None
Method Of Presentation: Group-Based-Internet
Developer: The Knowledge Group, LLC
Recommended CLE/CPE Hours: 1.75 - 2.0
Advance Preparation: Print and review course materials
Course Code: 124371
Recording Fee: $299 (Please click here for details)


Featured Speakers for Trademark Litigation: A 2013 Update LIVE Webcast :

Agenda  (click here to view more)

Charles S. Baker, Partner,
Fulbright & Jaworski LLP

Protecting Your Brand’s Online Presence
  • - Focus in Building a Website: Creating a Unique “User Experience”
  • - Copyright v. Trade Dress
  • - A look at the importance of bringing all possible claims

Christopher K. Larus, Partner,
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP

Title: Untangling the Web of Online Trademark Infringement
  • • The expanding use of social media platforms has created new avenues for infringement and often requires complex technical approaches to identifying infringers.
  • • Infringing uses include on-line scams, sales of counterfeit goods, and infringing user generated content
  • • In some cases the parties responsible are sophisticated and are part of a multi-layer same; in other cases the responsible parties are individual users who may be unaware of their infringement
  • • Stopping on-line trademark infringement increasingly requires both an understanding of computer forensic tools and legal strategies specifically targeted to uncover the complex business relationships underlying such infringement. This presentation will discuss both.
    • - Understanding multi-layer schemes and uncovering the players involved
    • - Theories of induced and contributory infringement
    • - Joint and several liability
    • - Creative uses of the Anti-cybersquatting Protection Act and Digital Millennium Copyright Act
    • - Managing social media takedown policies

Jonathan D. Goins, Partner,
Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan LLP

As a result of the rapid proliferation of new media and technology, the traditional notions of trademark law has been reshaped, redefined and reformed. I will focus on how new media and technology impact company trademark and brands, help increase and exploit advertising and marketing revenue streams, and provide for greater (or lesser) online enforcement protection efforts. I will provide insight on trademark-related litigation issues involving ambush marketing in promotional sponsorships, the new gTLD program, and online-related Lanham Act claims such as keyword advertising and false advertising. I will attempt to simplify some of these emerging trends and provide practical, innovative ways to manage risks in this daily evolving area of trademark law.

Wendi E. Sloane, Partner,
Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP

  • • What to do when your client gets a cease and desist letter or complaint: Litigation Holds and determining if there is insurance coverage.
  • • Conducing pre-filing pilot surveys: A cost/benefitg analysis
  • • Trademark Dilution claims: When to bring them
  • • Calculating damages for trademark infringement claims

Michael J. McCue , Partner,
Lewis and Roca LLP

  • - Covenants not to sue in trademark cases moot trademark infringement claim. Nike v. Already, __ S. Ct. __ (Jan. 9, 2013)
  • - TTAB abandons substantial similarity test for dilution in favor of sufficient similarity. Nike v. Maher, 100 U.S.P.Q.2d 1018 (2011)
  • - Progressive encroachment on a trademark can bar defense of laches. Oriental Financial v. Cooperative De Ahorro Y Credito Oriental, 698 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. Oct. 2012)
  • - New decisions on trademark functionality. Secalt (9th Cir.) and Christian Louboutin (2d Cir.)

Fulbright & Jaworski LLP
Charles S. Baker
speaker bio »»

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP
Christopher K. Larus
speaker bio »»

Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan LLP
Jonathan D. Goins
speaker bio »»

Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP
Wendi E. Sloane
speaker bio »»

Lewis and Roca LLP
Michael J. McCue
speaker bio »»

Who Should Attend?

- Attorneys
- Private Counsel
- In-House Counsel
- General Counsel
- IP Attorneys and Consultants
- Senior Management
- Trademark Lawyers
- And Other Interested Professionals

Why Attend?

This is a must attend event to anyone interested in learning updates regarding trademark litigation in 2013.

- Detailed guidance explained by the most qualified key leaders & experts
– Hear directly from experienced practitioners & thought leaders
- Interact directly with panel during Q&A

Register now and get the chance to ask questions and interact with the speakers, live. Advanced registration is recommended as space is limited. Please click the registration button below to enroll in this course today.

Registration Information:                                                                                                                                    

(Click here for information on group registrations and discounts)

Please note, the event date is firm although it may be subject to change. Please click here for details.
The Knowledge Group, LLC is producing this event for information purposes only. We do not intend to provide or offer business advice. The contents of this event are based upon the opinions of our speakers. The Knowledge Congress does not warrant their accuracy and completeness. The statements made by them are based on their independent opinions and does not necessarily reflect that of The Knowledge Congress' views. In no event shall The Knowledge Congress be liable to any person or business entity for any special, direct, indirect, punitive, incidental or consequential damages as a result of any information gathered from this webcast.









































Trademark Litigation: A 2013 Update
LIVE Webcast
Event Sponsors / Speaker Firms:

Founded in 1919, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. is a leading full-service international law firm, with more than 850 lawyers in 17 locations in Austin, Beijing, Dallas, Denver, Dubai, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Munich, New York, Pittsburgh-Southpointe, Riyadh, San Antonio, St. Louis and Washington, D.C. Fulbright provides a full range of legal services to clients worldwide. The 2012 BTI survey of FORTUNE 1000 general counsel chose Fulbright to its “The BTI Client Service 30,” and Corporate Board Member magazine named Fulbright among the top 25 corporate law firms in the U.S. in its survey of board members of public companies.

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.’s Trademark Infringement Litigation attorneys combine a sophisticated knowledge of trademark and advertising law with a national reputation as effective trial lawyers. The firm’s attorneys are experienced in trying cases in federal and state courts throughout the country, the ITC, and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

The firm consistently represents clients – both plaintiffs and defendants –in high-profile cases at the cutting edge of trademark law in a wide variety of disputes, including trademarks and trade dress, trademark dilution, rights of publicity, and enforcement of co-existence and trademark licensing agreements. The focus on understanding each client’s business and unique needs allows the firm’s attorneys to identify creative “win-win” solutions to trademark and advertising disputes.

Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan LLP ( is a national minority-owned law firm with 15 offices located in Atlanta; Boca Raton, Fla.; Boston; Chicago; Cleveland; Indianapolis; Los Angeles; Milwaukee; Nashville, Tenn.; New York; Phoenix; Stamford, Conn.; Washington, D.C.; Wayne, N.J; and West Des Moines, Iowa. The firm represents midsized to Fortune 1000 Corporations, governmental entities, and individuals in the areas of litigation, employment, environmental, corporate and transactional, public finance, intellectual property & technology, energy, communications & utilities law, restaurant & hospitality, and education law. Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan practices law with a commitment to quality, diversity and to the communities it serves.

Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP was founded in 1984, with the vision to create a new model that departed from the standard "mega-firm" approach and, instead, focused on delivering efficient, team-oriented services of the highest quality. Our founding partners - two highly respected law professors at Northwestern University and two former members of a prominent Chicago firm - were soon joined by like-minded colleagues and we have grown steadily ever since. The high levels of internal flexibility and extraordinary talent within our organization allow us to craft unusually practical and economical solutions to match client challenges and needs. This business-oriented approach has led many clients to engage Barack Ferrazzano to handle complex, time-sensitive, and high-stakes matters. Our attorneys leverage the environment we have created to become some of the finest lawyers available today.

Quality legal representation matters. At Lewis and Roca, it is part of our proud heritage. That is why for over a half century, we have been a leading business law firm in the Southwest. Founded in 1950 we have almost 200 attorneys in offices in Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas, Albuquerque, Reno and Silicon Valley. The firm serves a diverse base of local, regional, national and international clients, including some of the world's largest corporations. In today's ever-shifting markets, established and emerging companies continue to look to us to provide the solid foundation on which their businesses are built; enhancing and enabling our clients’ success.

Our strength is in the way we think. Successful outcomes depend on skillful preparation for challenges and opportunities. Across our extensive practice areas, we strive to develop sound legal strategies consistent with your objectives. We realize that this endeavor involves a thorough understanding of both the legal and business issues involved. Our attorneys are not just skillful, forward-thinking legal advocates; they are also experienced business professionals.


The Knowledge Group, LLC is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be addressed to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors, 150 Fourth Avenue North, Suite 700, Nashville, TN, 37219-2417. Website:


We are an approved multi-event sponsor in the state of California. Our provider ID is: 14451. In Texas, Illinois, and Virginia, we submit programs for individual approval in advance. In all other states, once attendance is verified, participants are emailed an official certificate of attendance which they submit to their respective State Bar Associations. Our programs are created with continuing education in mind and are therefore designed to meet the requirements of all State Bar Associations. If you have any questions, please email our CLE coordinator at:

Attention New York Attorneys:

This program is approved for CLE credit under New York’s Approved Jurisdiction policy. The Knowledge Group, LLC is an approved sponsor in the state of California, a New York Approved Jurisdiction. This program fulfills the non-traditional format requirement of exceeding 60 minutes in length. Please note only experienced attorneys (more than 2 years) are eligible to receive CLE credit via non-traditional format learning platforms. The Knowledge Group will verify attendance during the webcast via secret words (3 per credit hour) and by auditing attendees log in and log out records. All verification instructions will be provided during the webcast. Once attendance verification requirements have been completed, the attendee will be issued a certificate of attendance be The Knowledge Group for the course with the recommended number of credit hours. The Certificate of Attendance is normally sent via email in 24 hours or less.

To Claim Your CLE Credits:

The attorney should simply include credits earned via Knowledge Group webcasts when computing the total number of CLE credits completed, and keep the Knowledge Group Certificate of Attendance for a period of at least four (4) years in case of audit. An attorney may count towards her/his New York CLE requirement credit earned through the Approved Jurisdiction policy without notifying the CLE Board.

To learn more about New York’s Approved Jurisdiction policy. Please visit:

Attention Texas Attorneys:

This program is approved by the State Bar of Texas. The Knowledge Congress will provide Certificate of Attendance and will submit your credit directly to the State Bar once we verified your attendance and survey. Please make sure to include your Texas State Bar Number upon registration.

Attention Pennsylvania Attorneys:

Knowledge Congress is not yet an Accredited Distance Learning Provider in PA, neither the instructors nor any PA attendees will receive credit for the course.

Enrolled Agents Sponsor ID Number: 7602U

We have entered into an agreement with the Office of Professional Responsibility, Internal Revenue Service, to meet the requirements of 31 Code of Federal Regulations, section 10.6(g), covering maintenance of attendance records, retention of program outlines, qualifications of instructors, and length of class hours. This agreement does not constitute an endorsement by the Office of Professional Responsibility as to the quality of the program or its contribution to the professional competence of the enrolled individual.